The bottom line is that the more information the CSM has, the better advices it can give to CCP.

Zulu said CSM could have a selection of the Little Things backlog, and Soundwave wants the CSM to give him a GÇÿtop 10GÇÖ list drawn from it GÇô i.e. to have the CSM prioritize the items so BFF can get a better feel for what is important to players.

In fact no one has said anywhere that they're being dropped from any Wormholes.. Of course facts don't matter to people who just want to sieze on something - anything - to yell at the CSM about.

Smaller groups being less represented in a democratic system? What madness is this?

it was all done by the rules - unsubbed accounts were resubbed via hours for plex, multiboxers voted with several accounts, single-account dudes voted with their accounts

Split the vote by region? Have CSM positions that reflect the regions of space to try prevent it getting imbalanced in any one direction.

I have 3 accounts, I should be allowed 1 vote.
I should not be allowed to inflate a vote 3 fold over people who only have 1 account (the obviousness is obvious) to do so greatly increases the likelihood of manipulation and thus, conflicts of interest.

1 ISP = 1 vote
1 credit card account = 1 vote

Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences.
Add something new and different (a new kind of wormhole with pie?) to experiement and see what happens..

Don't break what is.

This thread should have died a long time ago.
The recent dev blogs coming out have shown that CCP are heading in a direction that I for one like:
- implants in pod kill-mails
- backending bug reports
- focusing on Eve Online over other games

Why you feel the need to bump your terrible thread and sight recent developments as evidence is beyond me.

Let me sort this out step by step:

1. Random WH/High Sec guy starts thread claiming that goons are in control of too much.
2. Thread grinds on with Op looking sillier and sillier.
3. CCP change direction to do things lots of players want.
4. Op bumps thread saying: see I told you so! I told you so!
5. I pass comment that thread should have died ages ago and that the changes in CCP have nothing to do with this terrible excuse for a thread.
6. You claim my memory is short cause "we have been asking for implants on KM's for ages'...

Way to take something out of context then jump to a stupid conclusion.

The result is the current CSM before you. The fact that NullSec pilots have more organization than HighSec pilots should not be an excuse to arbitrarily change the system. Find a candidate, get organized, and push for him/her to get elected.

EVE makes money, therefore all aspects of it should be bent on making CCP make more money.

**** making the game fun, right?

I'm done. I tried folks.

ROFL

I guess I missed that world-changing revolution, though I haven't read the news since Sunday...

And now they're talking about how they're trying to stop some guy from becoming a homosexual.

My god, this is useful stuff!

So you make an absolutely false and outrageous claim about the scientific gathering, amalgamation, and actioning of collective human opinion, and then defend that claim with a youtube link?

Well that's the end of your little farcical crusade.

No he didn't. The actual quote was about him hearing from some players that they were concerned about the CSM having a null sec bias. He didn't say he agreed with them.

So, pray tell, how does all this tie in to EVE then?

Must be pretty embarrassing to go through all this trouble only to have it all overthrown by one simple question.

I'm not upset in the slightest.

You've made the claims and you're making substantial suggestions about how people should act based on the validity of those claims. The burden is entirely on you to offer even an ounce of support for your claims.

I'm quite satisfied that anyone who can follow a line of conversation can now see that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, thereby making all your previous and following keyboard hammering completely worthless.

And now you've devolved from avoiding the issue right down to not even making sense.

A) When some of the major problems with EVE cannot be summed up in a simple survey questionnaire.

B) When you have no one available to sift through said data and tell CCP whats what (huh almost sounds like the CSM huh?)

C) When evidently 80% of the playerbase can't be arsed to fill it out despite claiming the world is out to get them.

If such a system was viable it would have been implemented already.

And most importantly, said system lacks a "No CCP don't do this" feature.

Your defense is you have no logical argument .. So no one can make a counterpoint to it.. Therefore you win. :facepalm:

And dating sites hire people to sift through said data while also using a rather mundane matchmaker :P

You'll never admit it but Mittens is the best player advocate you have and all of you calling for him to be kicked off the CSM because he likes to blow up miners or you just hate goons in general are idiots.

This is a business not a "game" about spaceship